About DMAC. (n.d.). The Ohio State University. https://english.osu.edu/dmac-institute-ohio-state/about-dmac

Global Arts + Humanities: Discovery Theme. (n.d.). The Ohio State University. https://globalartsandhumanities.osu.edu/

Hamraie, A. (2017). Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. University of Minnesota Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/56024/

Harter C.A. & Ku, H.Y. (2008). The effects of spatial contiguity within computer-based instruction of group personalized two-step mathematics word problems. Computers in Human Behavior, 24. 1668–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.006

Kleege, G. (2015). Visuality. In R. Adams (Ed.), Keywords for Disability Studies (pp. 182-184). New York University Press.

Lionni, L. L. (1963). Swimmy [E-book]. Dragon Fly Books. https://bookcandy.typepad.com/files/swimmy-by-leo-lionni.pdf

Machado, C.T., & Carvalho, A.A. (2020). Concept Mapping: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1712579

Mara, A., & Hawk, B. (2010). Posthuman Rhetorics and Technical Communication [Special issue]. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/10572250903373031

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320.

Mingus, M. (2017, April 12). Access Intimacy, Interdependence and Disability Justice. Leaving Evidence. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/access-intimacy-
interdependence-and-disability-justice/

multimodality. Oxford Reference. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191800986.001.0001/acref-9780191800986-e-1806

Schneider, S., Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., & Rey, G.D. (2021). How organization highlighting through signaling, spatial contiguity and segmenting can influence learning with concept maps. Computers and Education Open, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100040

Shankar, T. R. (2006). Speaking on the record: A theory of composition. Computers and Composition, 23(3), 374-393. DOI:10.1016/J.COMPCOM.2006.05.002

semiotic. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/semiotic

Transformative Access Project: About the Project. (n.d.). The Ohio State University: College of Arts and Sciences. https://u.osu.edu/transformativeaccess/

Yergeau, R., Brewer, E., Kerschbaum, S., Oswal, S., Price, M., Salvo, M., Selfe, C., & Howes, F.(2013). Multimodality in Motion. Kairos 18.1: Yergeau Et Al., Multimodality in Motion – Modality. https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/18.1/coverweb/yergeau-et-al/pages/mod/index.html

---

Bibliography: Webtext Images

Aimi Hamraie. (2017). Figure 5.14 [primary sources]. University of Minnesota Press, p. 173.

Christiane Machado & Ana Carvalho. (2020). Figure 1 [graphic]. The Journal of Higher Education, p. 39.

Contemporary Jewish Museum. (2018). Haptic Encounter by Georgina Kleege with work by Julia Goodma [film stills]. Video by Laurie Lezin-Schmidt. Photos by Gary Sexton Photography.

Figma. (n.d.). Online Concept Map Maker—Free Template—FigJam. [graphic]. https://www.figma.com/templates/concept-map/.

Leo Lionni. (1963). Swimmy. [illustration]. Random House Inc., New York.

Lucid Content Team. (2019). How to Make a Concept Map [graphic]. Lucidchart. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/how-to-make-a-concept-map

Rachel Rubino. (2023). Brainstorming Note [graphic].

Rachel Rubino. (2023) Nicholas Rubino Guitar [film still]. Video by Rachel Rubino. Photo by Rachel Rubino.

Sascha Schneider et al. (2021). Fig. 4 [model]. Computers and Education Open, p. 8.